To help understand the ongoing debate on Peter Heehs’s recent book, The Lives of Sri Aurobindo, we have to take into consideration that the divergent interpretations of the Avatar may find an explanation in the Mother’s definition of atavism, a cardinal tenet of Integral Yoga. Here is a striking example:

 

If you want to appraise the real value of the religion in which you are born or brought up or to have a correct perspective of the country or society to which you belong by birth, if you want to find out how relative a thing the particular environment is into which you happened to be thrown and confined, you have only to go round the earth and see that what you think good is looked upon as bad elsewhere and what is considered as bad in one place is welcomed as good in another. All countries and all religions are built up out of a mass of traditions. In all of them you will meet saints and heroes and great and mighty personalities as well as small and wicked people. You will then perceive what a mockery it is to say, “Because I am brought up in this religion, therefore it is the only true religion; because I am born in this country, therefore it is the best of all countries.” [1]

 

The Mother continues as follows:

 

If we go a little way within ourselves, we shall discover that there is in each of us a consciousness that has been living throughout the ages and manifesting in a multitude of forms. Each of us has been born in many different countries, belonged to many different nations, followed many different religions. Why must we accept the last one as the best? The experiences gathered by us in all these many lives in different countries and varying religions, are stored up in that inner continuity of our consciousness which persists through all births. There are multiple personalities there created by these past experiences, and when we become aware of this multitude within us, it becomes impossible to speak of one particular form of truth as the only truth, one country as our only country, one religion as the only true religion. There are people who have been born into one country, although the leading elements of their consciousness obviously belong to another. I have met some born in Europe who were evidently Indians; I have met others born in Indian bodies who were as evidently Europeans. In Japan I have met some who were Indian, others who were European. And if any of them goes to the country or enters into the civilisation to which he has affinity, he finds himself there perfectly at home.

 

If your aim is to be free, in the freedom of the Spirit, you must get rid of all the ties that are not the inner truth of your being, but come from subconscious habits. If you wish to consecrate yourself entirely, absolutely and exclusively to the Divine, you must do it in all completeness; you must not leave bits of yourself tied here and there. [2]

 

Here is another example:

 

You are born in India. Being born in India you are born with a certain religious and philosophic attitude. But if for some reason or other you want to free yourself from this atavism and influence, if you begin to follow, study, practice the religion or philosophy of another country, you can change the conditions of your inner development. It is a little more difficult, that is, it asks for a greater effort for liberation, but it is very far from being impossible. …

 

When things seem contradictory to you, it is always because you have remained on too low a plane. If you know how to climb up a few rungs of the ladder, all contradictions disappear, everything becomes complementary. [3]

 

Along with the foregoing quotes, it is of paramount importance to bring to light certain aspects of Avatarhood according to the way Sri Aurobindo and the Mother themselves define it. No matter how difficult it is for a certain mentality to accept, without this the picture would be incomplete, and the in-depth significance of the Divine taking a human body for Its earthly manifestation not fully understood. The Mother writes:

 

The Divine, being all-powerful, can lift people up without bothering to come down on earth. It is only if it is part of the world arrangement that he should take upon himself the burden of humanity and open the Way that avatarhood has any meaning. [4]

 

She further notes that “… even the embodied god cannot be perfect on earth until men are ready to understand and accept perfection”, and explains:

 

Nevertheless, even the Divine, when incarnate on earth, is subject to the same law of progress. His instrument of manifestation, the physical being he has assumed, should be in a constant state of progress, and the law of his personal self-expression is in a way linked to the general law of earthly progress. Thus, even the embodied god cannot be perfect on earth until men are ready to understand and accept perfection. [5]

 

This is key to understanding the nature of the Avatar in all its divine complexity. The necessary ‘imperfection’ of the incarnated Divine is an essential aspect of the Avatar, as it clearly emerges from reading how Sri Aurobindo describes Avatarhood, as well as how he documents his own sadhana in Volume 26 of the Centenary Edition, On Himself. But first let us examine a few other statements from the Mother.

 

The Avatar comes to the earth to prove that the Divine can... it is not so much to prove by words as to prove by a certain realization. [6]

 

She then introduces an essential distinction between the Divine manifesting in Its “constructive and preservative” aspect as the Avatars of Vishnu, versus Its “transformative and destructive aspect”, manifesting as Shiva. Regarding Buddha, the Mother observes that he “manifested something of the power of Shiva: it was the same compassion, the same understanding of all the misery, and the same power which destroys—obviously with the intention of transforming, but destroys rather than constructs.” She finally concludes with these revealing words, “Now, you see, this question of the Divine upon the earth: well, quite naturally those who believed in him have made a god of him. One has only to see all the temples and all the Buddhist godheads to know that human nature has always the tendency to deify what it admires. We are fallible human beings... [6]

 

Rather than deification, it is sacrifice in its broadest and most integral sense, including the sacrifice of perfection, which defines the true nature and mission of the Avatar. Regarding Krishna, the Mother explains that “he came upon earth to bring freedom and delight. He came to announce to men, enslaved to Nature, to their passions and errors, that if they took refuge in the Supreme Lord they would be free from all bondage and sin.” But regarding Jesus, she notes that he “had to die in pain, on the cross, so that his message might be heard. For men cherish suffering and hatred and want their God to suffer with them.” [7] A few days later the Mother further defines Jesus’s Avatarhood as “the concrete and dramatic enactment of the divine sacrifice: the Supreme Lord… accepting to assume human ignorance and suffering in matter” [8] She observes:

 

In the Essays on the Gita Sri Aurobindo mentions the names of three Avatars, and Christ is one of them. An Avatar is an emanation of the Supreme Lord who assumes a human body on earth. I heard Sri Aurobindo himself say that Christ was an emanation of the Lord’s aspect of love.

 

… the death of Christ was the starting-point of a new stage in the evolution of human civilisation. … The story of Christ, as it has been told, is the concrete and dramatic enactment of the divine sacrifice: the Supreme Lord, who is All-Light, All-Knowledge, All- Power, All-Beauty, All-Love, All-Bliss, accepting to assume human ignorance and suffering in matter, in order to help men to emerge from the falsehood in which they live and because of which they die. [9]

 

The Mother further states that “Men tolerate the presence of the Divine upon earth only on condition that He suffers there.” [10] And, in another poignant message, she observes that “Only when men depend exclusively on the Divine and on nothing else, will it no longer be necessary for the incarnate god to die for them.” [11]

 

This leads back to the very raison d’être of the Avatar. The Mother recalls that:

 

I could speak to you of a very old tradition, more ancient than the two known lines of spiritual and occult tradition, that is, the Vedic and Chaldean lines; a tradition which seems to have been at the origin of these two known traditions, in which it is said that when, as a result of the action of the adverse forces—known in the Hindu tradition as the Asuras—the world, instead of developing according to its law of Light and inherent consciousness, was plunged into the darkness, inconscience and ignorance that we know, the Creative Power implored the Supreme Origin, asking him for a special intervention which could save this corrupted universe; and in reply to this prayer there was emanated from the Supreme Origin a special Entity, of Love and Consciousness, who cast himself directly into the most inconscient matter to begin there the work of awakening it to the original Consciousness and Love.

 

In the old narratives this Being is described as stretched out in a deep sleep at the bottom of a very dark cave, and in his sleep there emanated from him prismatic rays of light which gradually spread into the Inconscience and embedded themselves in all the elements of this Inconscience to begin there the work of Awakening.

 

If one consciously enters into this Inconscient, one can still see there this same marvellous Being, still in deep sleep, continuing his work of emanation, spreading his Light; and he will continue to do it until the Inconscience is no longer inconscient, until Darkness disappears from the world—and the whole creation awakens to the Supramental Consciousness. [12]

 

This Being in “a deep sleep at the bottom of a very dark cave”, whose “prismatic rays of light” “embedded themselves in all the elements of this Inconscience to begin there the work of Awakening”, the Mother explains, is “the first universal Avatar”, “the origin of all Avatars”, “a conscious intervention of the Supreme in the darkest matter … in order to awaken this Matter to the receptivity of the Divine Forces.” She continues:

 

In fact, this is the origin of all Avatars. He is, so to say, the first universal Avatar who, gradually, has assumed more and more conscious bodies and finally manifested in a kind of recognised line of Beings who have descended directly from the Supreme to perfect this work of preparing the universe so that, through a continuous progression, it may become ready to receive and manifest the supramental Light in its entirety.

 

In every country, every tradition, the event has been presented in a special way, with different limitations, different details, particular features, but truly speaking, the origin of all these stories is the same, and that is what we could call a direct, conscious intervention of the Supreme in the darkest matter, without going through all the intermediaries, in order to awaken this Matter to the receptivity of the Divine Forces.

 

The intervals separating these various incarnations seem to become shorter and shorter, as if, to the extent that Matter became more and more ready, the action could accelerate and become more and more rapid in its movement, more and more conscious too, more and more effective and decisive.

 

And it will go on multiplying and intensifying until the entire universe becomes the total Avatar of the Supreme. [13]

 

Self-sacrifice, the Avatar’s most supreme expression of love… I will next present how Sri Aurobindo’s words in On Himself and Letters on Yoga are the highest self-witness of the Divine who, upon taking a human body, necessarily assumes the burden of unregenerate human nature, so as to show to humanity the way to self-perfection.

 


References

Note: The Mother’s quotes are taken from the second edition of the Collected Works of the Mother, 2003. The date is followed by the volume’s number, then the page’s number.

 

 [1] 9 June 1929, Vol. 3, pp. 82-3

[2] 9 June 1929, Vol. 3, 83-4

[3] 16 November 1955, Vol. 7, 371

[4] 6 March 1935, Vol. 15, 18

[5] Bulletin, April 1953, Vol. 12, 64

[6] 7 September 1955, Vol. 7, 292-3

[7] 3 June 1960, Vol. 10, 61

[8] 16 June 1960, Vol. 10, 61

[9] Ibid.

[10] Vol. 15, 18

[11] 2 August 1952, Vol. 15, 18

[12] 28 May 1958, Vol. 9, 332-3

[13] 28 May 1958, Vol. 9, 333-4