.

 


As the tradition of marrying Indian women became more widespread, the lifestyle of British settlers turned completely Indian. They became accustomed to Indian food and forgot the taste of English cuisine. When Fanny Parkes visited Col Gardner, she ate only Indian food during her stay.


Similarly, these settlers also adopted the Indian dress. When Bishop Heber met Ochterlony, he found him dressed in Indian clothing, looking like a Mughal noble.


Due to the extreme polarisation of wealth, a large section of society was crushed by poverty. Thus servants were available at very low salary and the British, like the Indian nobles, employed many servants for their comfort as well as for status. For example one of the British traders at Calcutta, though not very rich or resourceful, had 63 servants at his disposal. Those who were rich and powerful often kept more than a hundred. The number of servants one could afford was a symbol of one’s status, honour and respect in society.


It is interesting to learn how the duties of this army of servants were divided. For example, it was customary for every noble Englishman to keep a servant whose duty was to maintain the huqqa or hubble bubble ready for him. The servant accompanied him along with his hubble bubble when the master went out for a walk or as a guest to someone’s house. After dinner, all servants brought the huqqas, placed them in front of their masters and silently stood behind them.


Like the Indian nobles, the British officers also took their servants to the battlefield. In 1780, a captain had a Steward, a cook, a keeper of his dress, two servants for his horse, a barber, and a waterman. There were 115 quliis to carry his baggage which included wine, tea, chickens for food and goats for a regular supply of milk.


Fanny Parkes writes that in a household of a middle class British family there were at least 35 servants at a monthly salary from Rs 4 to 12. These servants included: a khansama, whose duty was to buy household goods, the amber was in charge of wine, water and ice, while the mash’alchi was in charge of light during the night; tailor master, water carrier, milkman, coachman, gardener, carpenter, cooks, ayhas for children, guards, and peons made up the rest of the retinue.


Analysing the endless supply of cheap labour available to the rich, one can understand the economic condition of common people who were ready to work on minimum salary. One can see how the aristocracy enjoyed the pleasures of life and exploited the poverty of their subordinates. When an Englishman visited India in 1858 and saw so many servants in the homes of his countrymen, he was shocked. But when he was told that their monthly salary he understood the phenomenon of keeping a large number of servants.


It is interesting to learn the daily routine of an English officer. It was the duty of a servant to wake up his master. A barber shaved him while he was lying in bed, cut his nails, and cleaned his ears. By this time his breakfast was ready which he ate at his leisure. After that his barber arranged his hair. Then it was time for the huqqa; the servant who was in charge of it served it after cleaning it and filling fresh tobacco. When the officer went to his office he was accompanied by up to 12 servants who carried his office files and other baggage.


Unfortunately, the feudal culture is still thriving in Pakistan. We see it not only in the jagirs of feudal lords but even in the cities where elite classes faithfully follow these outdated feudal traditions to preserve their status in society. We do not have the Mughals or the British but we have retained their heritage of the feudal culture.


Dawn: Sunday, 14 March 2010

http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/in-paper-magazine/the-review/indianisation-of-the-british-430